Skip to main content
Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Peer review must remain principal basis for research funding decisions

Peer review must remain principal basis for research funding decisions

The Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences expresses concern regarding the news that Ministerial veto was applied to grants worth $4.2 million, which had been recommended for funding by the Australia Research Council, without communication of this decision or the reason for it to the applicants or their institutions.

The grants had been recommended for funding by the ARC, following rigorous peer review. This robust, independent process underpins the integrity of the research funding system.

The ARC funds valuable research across disciplines – indeed, many of the world’s most pressing challenges will only be solved through solutions that draw on insights and expertise from multiple fields.

Review by independent experts should remain the principal basis for decisions on competitive research funding.

AAHMS

Related Publications

2026 Outstanding First Nations Researcher Medals
14 September 2026 Media Release, News

2026 Outstanding First Nations Researcher Medals

Evidence does not support leucovorin for autism
7 September 2026 Media Release, News

Evidence does not support leucovorin for autism

Trust in HMS under pressure
22 July 2026 Media Release, News

Trust in HMS under pressure

Secret Link